Non-Disparagement Clause Restricting Negative Statements

A non-disparagement clause restricts one or more parties from making certain negative statements about another party.

A non-disparagement clause restricts one or more parties from making certain negative statements about another party.

It is often used to protect reputation after a deal, employment separation, settlement, or business relationship.

Why a non-disparagement clause matters

The clause can affect what parties may say publicly or privately after a dispute or relationship ends.

Its scope matters because overly broad wording can conflict with statutory rights, whistleblower protections, labor rights, consumer review rules, or public-policy limits.

Where a non-disparagement clause appears

Non-disparagement clauses appear in settlement agreements, severance agreements, employment agreements, acquisition documents, partnership exits, influencer contracts, and service agreements.

They may be paired with confidentiality, release, cooperation, or announcement provisions.

How it differs from nearby terms

A non-disparagement clause restricts negative statements. A confidentiality clause restricts disclosure of protected information.

A waiver clause may give up certain rights or objections, while a non-disparagement clause focuses on speech about another party.

Practical example

A settlement agreement says neither party will make public statements intended to harm the other’s business reputation, subject to legally required disclosures and truthful testimony.

Quick check

Question: Is a non-disparagement clause mainly about restricting negative statements?

Answer: Yes. It limits certain statements that could harm another party’s reputation.